<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What will loss of Pinon Canyon money mean?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csbj.com/2009/05/14/business-community-ponders-pinon-canyon-plan-effects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csbj.com/2009/05/14/business-community-ponders-pinon-canyon-plan-effects/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:47:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jocko</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2009/05/14/business-community-ponders-pinon-canyon-plan-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-1866</link>
		<dc:creator>jocko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 23:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=3957#comment-1866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our wonderful city managers thought it was ok to steal citizens private property on North Academy a few years ago under the claim of emminent domain... that the city could rezone it and make more tax money off of it as commercial property. Our founding fathers are probably still spinning in their graves over that one. Respecting the property of private citizens has been the one differentiating feature of our Constitution and country. Now that cities and our Supreme Court view foreign law practices more important than the Consititution, we are just sliding further down the slope of globalism. No where in the UN laws are private citizens rights to the ownership to property upheld. 
As to Pinon Canyon, I can&#039;t think of a better example of claiming emminent domain. When the federal government needs land to better improve the perfromance of the military that protects us, what better reason could there be? 
In the future, don&#039;t be surprised when Ft Carson starts downsizing and moving units to Ft. Polk. Another screwed up deal like USOC and the semiconductor industry presented to us by the City Council. Some of you may remember that Colorado Springs was going to be the &#039;Silicon Mountain&#039; of the semiconductor industry. We even had a few international symposiums based on local semiconductor and electronics companies products and plans. At those symposiums, we had editors from all of the major domestic and international publications in attendance. But, EDC could not get the state of Colorado and Colorado Springs to offer equitable incentive packages,]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our wonderful city managers thought it was ok to steal citizens private property on North Academy a few years ago under the claim of emminent domain&#8230; that the city could rezone it and make more tax money off of it as commercial property. Our founding fathers are probably still spinning in their graves over that one. Respecting the property of private citizens has been the one differentiating feature of our Constitution and country. Now that cities and our Supreme Court view foreign law practices more important than the Consititution, we are just sliding further down the slope of globalism. No where in the UN laws are private citizens rights to the ownership to property upheld.<br />
As to Pinon Canyon, I can&#8217;t think of a better example of claiming emminent domain. When the federal government needs land to better improve the perfromance of the military that protects us, what better reason could there be?<br />
In the future, don&#8217;t be surprised when Ft Carson starts downsizing and moving units to Ft. Polk. Another screwed up deal like USOC and the semiconductor industry presented to us by the City Council. Some of you may remember that Colorado Springs was going to be the &#8216;Silicon Mountain&#8217; of the semiconductor industry. We even had a few international symposiums based on local semiconductor and electronics companies products and plans. At those symposiums, we had editors from all of the major domestic and international publications in attendance. But, EDC could not get the state of Colorado and Colorado Springs to offer equitable incentive packages,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken G.</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2009/05/14/business-community-ponders-pinon-canyon-plan-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-1863</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=3957#comment-1863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree with RJF - duh.....when you push back as hard as S. Colorado did on this land deal, of course the government will take it&#039;s MILLIONS and seek elsewhere.  And no, this is not just a one year budgetary issue.  This is money left over from the Bush administration who encourages growth in our military.  Our new administration is the opposite - shrink our military.  Thus I doubt we&#039;ll see this money come back to Colorado Springs.

And study what Fred?  Every time I open a column or news piece, there is the economic suggestion to &#039;study it.&#039;  Like the $160k we gave an Austin based consultant who in turn CONFIRMED what we already know and knew - COS get off the dead seat, make improvements to attract companies to our great city.  No, we study for months or years and then make a decision AFTER the market has moved past us....

Of course the Army is committed to this area....they&#039;re only spending millions to move thousands of soldiers and support personnel to Ft. Carson.  Ironically, the EDC, Chamber and other figure heads of our city are (and have) all lined up to take credit for this great move...(to many of their credits they did impact the Army in their decision).  HOWEVER, that being said, the Armed Forces make decisions on the POM and PPP years well in advance of &#039;talking to the locals.&#039;  With the transformation of the Army, Ft. Carson and it&#039;s location continue to be ideal for expanding and moving soldiers and assets here.  The Pinon deal is a strike against our state for it&#039;s short sidedness to not work aggressively with the landowners to find a middle ground.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with RJF &#8211; duh&#8230;..when you push back as hard as S. Colorado did on this land deal, of course the government will take it&#8217;s MILLIONS and seek elsewhere.  And no, this is not just a one year budgetary issue.  This is money left over from the Bush administration who encourages growth in our military.  Our new administration is the opposite &#8211; shrink our military.  Thus I doubt we&#8217;ll see this money come back to Colorado Springs.</p>
<p>And study what Fred?  Every time I open a column or news piece, there is the economic suggestion to &#8216;study it.&#8217;  Like the $160k we gave an Austin based consultant who in turn CONFIRMED what we already know and knew &#8211; COS get off the dead seat, make improvements to attract companies to our great city.  No, we study for months or years and then make a decision AFTER the market has moved past us&#8230;.</p>
<p>Of course the Army is committed to this area&#8230;.they&#8217;re only spending millions to move thousands of soldiers and support personnel to Ft. Carson.  Ironically, the EDC, Chamber and other figure heads of our city are (and have) all lined up to take credit for this great move&#8230;(to many of their credits they did impact the Army in their decision).  HOWEVER, that being said, the Armed Forces make decisions on the POM and PPP years well in advance of &#8216;talking to the locals.&#8217;  With the transformation of the Army, Ft. Carson and it&#8217;s location continue to be ideal for expanding and moving soldiers and assets here.  The Pinon deal is a strike against our state for it&#8217;s short sidedness to not work aggressively with the landowners to find a middle ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave hughes</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2009/05/14/business-community-ponders-pinon-canyon-plan-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-1862</link>
		<dc:creator>dave hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=3957#comment-1862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll tell you what the effect will be. It sends a loud and clear signal to the Army that Colorado is NOT willing to even provide the training area it needs out of marginal, remote, ranch land to justify its stationing troops here. 

So just prepare for the eventual shut down of Fort Carson and the billions in payroll, military and civilian it represents.

I have followed this issue from the beginning. I charge that neither Colorado Springs or El Paso County or State eleced officicials   worked hard enough to get the Army what it needed. 

Now they aqre going to pay the price.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll tell you what the effect will be. It sends a loud and clear signal to the Army that Colorado is NOT willing to even provide the training area it needs out of marginal, remote, ranch land to justify its stationing troops here. </p>
<p>So just prepare for the eventual shut down of Fort Carson and the billions in payroll, military and civilian it represents.</p>
<p>I have followed this issue from the beginning. I charge that neither Colorado Springs or El Paso County or State eleced officicials   worked hard enough to get the Army what it needed. </p>
<p>Now they aqre going to pay the price.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RJF</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2009/05/14/business-community-ponders-pinon-canyon-plan-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-1856</link>
		<dc:creator>RJF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 20:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=3957#comment-1856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uhh ...duh Mike!  You are the master of the obvious!  Hey Binn... get a grip on reality!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uhh &#8230;duh Mike!  You are the master of the obvious!  Hey Binn&#8230; get a grip on reality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Contrarian</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2009/05/14/business-community-ponders-pinon-canyon-plan-effects/comment-page-1/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Contrarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 19:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=3957#comment-1855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tough Beans!   You want the economic development? Then go ahead and take land in El Pisso County. Leave us alone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough Beans!   You want the economic development? Then go ahead and take land in El Pisso County. Leave us alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
