<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cutting, even mutilation, won’t alleviate city’s pain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csbj.com/2010/02/12/cutting-even-mutilation-won%E2%80%99t-alleviate-city%E2%80%99s-pain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csbj.com/2010/02/12/cutting-even-mutilation-won%e2%80%99t-alleviate-city%e2%80%99s-pain/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Battershill</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2010/02/12/cutting-even-mutilation-won%e2%80%99t-alleviate-city%e2%80%99s-pain/comment-page-1/#comment-17638</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Battershill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 00:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=25073#comment-17638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems to me John, that one way or another you are in favor of tax increases for things that you feel are important.  Whereas, it is certainly advantageous to have all the amenities you suggest, government&#039;s business is to insure basic infrastructure for all citizens. ALL citizens need the fire and police services. SOME citizens want to use the amenities but they do not need them. When the city goes broke or raises taxes exhorbitantly, how many of those young &quot;creative class&quot; will be attracted? It sounds to me that rather than &quot;cut, cut, and cut&quot;, you would rather spend, spend, and spend!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me John, that one way or another you are in favor of tax increases for things that you feel are important.  Whereas, it is certainly advantageous to have all the amenities you suggest, government&#8217;s business is to insure basic infrastructure for all citizens. ALL citizens need the fire and police services. SOME citizens want to use the amenities but they do not need them. When the city goes broke or raises taxes exhorbitantly, how many of those young &#8220;creative class&#8221; will be attracted? It sounds to me that rather than &#8220;cut, cut, and cut&#8221;, you would rather spend, spend, and spend!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
