The caustic U.S. political climate has become a suspect of sorts in the rampage that left six dead and a U.S. congresswoman critically injured in Arizona. Already, appeals are being heard to tone down the rhetoric.
The captured suspect’s motives remain unknown despite his online diatribes betraying resentment of the government and a scattered state of mind. Still, the attack on Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and those who were with her has intensified the scrutiny on how much is too much, and how hot is too hot, in political debate.
Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois, the second-ranking Democratic leader in the Senate, on Sunday cited imagery of crosshairs on political opponents and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s combative rallying cry, “Don’t retreat; reload.”
“These sorts of things, I think, invite the kind of toxic rhetoric that can lead unstable people to believe this is an acceptable response,” Durbin said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”
The attack might be the work of “a single nut,” Democratic Rep. Raul Grijalva, whose Arizona district shares Tucson with Giffords’ district, said Saturday, the day Giffords was shot. But he said the nation must assess the fallout of “an atmosphere where the political discourse is about hate, anger and bitterness.”
Still others cautioned against blaming political rhetoric – or the language and imagery of a particular political group – for the tragedy in Tucson. Republicans were especially sensitive to suggestions that the conservative tea party movement, with its anti-government stances, was contributing to a more poisonous political environment,
Sen. Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican, noted Sunday that the suspect in the Tucson rampage was connected to Internet postings that included Marxist and Nazi literature.
“That’s not the profile of a typical tea party member, if that’s the inference that’s being made,” he said on CNN.
Rep. Raul Labrador, an Idaho Republican who ran as a tea party favorite, said on “Meet the Press” on NBC: “I just hope we can have some civility and move forward. You have extremes on both sides; you have crazy people on both sides. Your job as a leader is to talk to people in a rational way to bring down the rhetoric”.
The House’s newly installed Republican leaders postponed Wednesday’s scheduled vote to repeal the new health care law. That divisive issue was at the center of the harshest criticisms of Giffords and many other Democrats for the past two years.
The chief law enforcement official in the House, Sergeant-at-Arms Bill Livingood, said the Tucson attack did not appear to be part of a larger threat against Congress. Still, as a precaution, he advised each House member’s office in an e-mail Saturday evening to get in touch with local law enforcement.
Washington and the nation have experienced a year or more of raw politics, with anger spilling over on both sides and gun-related metaphors coming loosely from the lips of some candidates and activists. Giffords, who had been a figurative target of the right, warned months ago that the verbal assaults were beyond the pale and could have dire results.
In Pima County, Arizona, Sheriff Clarence Dupnik suggested “all this vitriol” in recent discourse might be connected to Saturday’s shootings. “This may be free speech,” he told reporters, “but it’s not without consequences.”
Jonathan Cowan, president of the centrist Democratic group Third Way, said: “We do know that politics has become too personal, too nasty and perhaps too dangerous. Perhaps out of this senseless act some sense can return to our public discourse.”
Many lawmakers, especially Democrats, felt the 2009-2010 debate over health care sometimes got out of hand. It began with emotional public town hall meetings hosted by lawmakers in the summer of 2009, when some angry critics warned of government “death panels.”
Giffords, 40, was among lawmakers who reported 42 threats or acts or vandalism in the first three months of 2010, a big increase over the previous year, law enforcement officers said. Nearly all the threats dealt with the massive health care bill that Giffords and other Democrats enacted over fierce Republican opposition.
In March, someone kicked in or shot out a glass door and side window at Giffords’ office in Tucson, a few hours after the House passed the health care measure with her help.
Giffords also was among about 20 Democrats opposed in last November’s elections by Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee. Palin’s Facebook page in March posted a U.S. map with the cross-hairs of a gun scope imposed over each of the 20 Democrats’ districts. Gun imagery appeared in various ways in the campaign, often not connected at all with gun rights.
“We’re on Sarah Palin’s targeted list,” Giffords said at the time. “The way that she has it depicted has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district. When people do that, they’ve got to realize there are consequences to that action.”
Palin’s Facebook page after the shooting extended condolences to Giffords’ family and the other victims.
The suspected gunman, Jared Loughner, complained about the government online and spoke of matters involving currency, terrorism and “mind control.” But what might have driven him to violence has not been established.
“We don’t yet know what provoked this unspeakable act,” President Barack Obama said Saturday from the White House. “We are going to get to the bottom of this.”
Obama said he’s dispatched the head of the FBI to Arizona to oversee the investigation.