Feds threaten to sue states over union laws

Filed under: Daily News | Tags:

The National Labor Relations Board on Friday threatened to sue Arizona, South Carolina, South Dakota and Utah over constitutional amendments guaranteeing workers the right to a secret ballot in union elections.

The agency’s acting general counsel, Lafe Solomon, said the amendments conflict with federal law, which gives employers the option of recognizing a union if a majority of workers sign cards that support unionizing.

The amendments, approved Nov. 2, have taken effect in South Dakota and Utah, and will do so soon in Arizona and South Carolina.

Business and anti-union groups sought the amendments, arguing that such secrecy is necessary to protect workers against union intimidation. They are concerned that Congress might enact legislation requiring employers to allow the “card check” process for forming unions instead of secret ballot elections.

In letters to the attorney general of each state, Solomon says the amendments are pre-empted by the supremacy clause of the Constitution because they conflict with employee rights laid out in the National Labor Relations Act. That clause says that when state and federal laws are at odds, federal law prevails.

Solomon is asking the attorneys general in South Dakota and Utah for official statements agreeing that their amendments are unconstitutional “to conserve state and federal resources.”

In his letter to South Carolina’s attorney general, Solomon asks the state to take measures that would prevent the Legislature from ratifying the amendment. Solomon requested that Arizona’s governor decline to act to make the amendment official.

Messages left with aides for each attorney general Friday were not immediately returned.

Unions long have pushed for the card check legislation, but the effort hasn’t won enough support in Congress. Union officials say companies often use aggressive tactics – borderline illegal, they contend – to discourage workers from organizing unions.

Americans for Prosperity, a conservative group that spent millions to back congressional Republicans in last year’s elections, was among the groups that pushed for passage of the state amendments. Phil Kerpen, the group’s vice president for policy, said the NLRB’s action “shows how determined the board is to accomplish card check by back door means against the wishes of the American people and Congress.”

Kimberly Freeman Brown, executive director of the pro-union group American Rights at Work, said the board was confirming that “these initiatives were intended to restrict workers’ rights to determine how they choose a union, disingenuously cloaked in the language of worker protection.”

One Response to Feds threaten to sue states over union laws

  1. Quick… will a Colorado rep or senator please step up and initiate a bill with the same wording as these other states. Once again the feds are overstepping their Constitutional authority. I am afraid it will probably have to be a Republican law maker as the democrats are too deeply sewen into the union’s pockets.

    I am afraid that the American’s for Prosperity are entirely right that this is just another way this administration is trying to avoid due process and bureacrat force unionization.

    By the way, enacting the secret ballot legislation would be entirley in the spirit of our existing right to work laws.

    January 17, 2011 at 1:00 pm