<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Latest court ruling a blow for health care reform opponents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csbj.com/2011/01/18/latest-court-ruling-a-blow-for-health-care-reform-opponents/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csbj.com/2011/01/18/latest-court-ruling-a-blow-for-health-care-reform-opponents/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 02:50:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jocko</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2011/01/18/latest-court-ruling-a-blow-for-health-care-reform-opponents/comment-page-1/#comment-52116</link>
		<dc:creator>jocko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=38489#comment-52116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this conclusion may be wishful thinking on authors part. 

There is a huge difference in regulating whether you can have a product and regulating whether you must buy a product which this healthcare bill requires. 

Another point is this is not the same Supreme Court and we know that the Supreme Court does not judge vis a vis the law as much as the way they would like it to be. Just like the Supreme Court used to rule that the Bible was suitable and recommended for teaching for our first 150 years, and now one can&#039;t mention it in schools after &#039;reinterpretation&#039; during the last 40 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this conclusion may be wishful thinking on authors part. </p>
<p>There is a huge difference in regulating whether you can have a product and regulating whether you must buy a product which this healthcare bill requires. </p>
<p>Another point is this is not the same Supreme Court and we know that the Supreme Court does not judge vis a vis the law as much as the way they would like it to be. Just like the Supreme Court used to rule that the Bible was suitable and recommended for teaching for our first 150 years, and now one can&#8217;t mention it in schools after &#8216;reinterpretation&#8217; during the last 40 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Colvin</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2011/01/18/latest-court-ruling-a-blow-for-health-care-reform-opponents/comment-page-1/#comment-52111</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Colvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 19:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=38489#comment-52111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It really won&#039;t matter,  Obama&#039;s right now selling us out to the Chinese.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really won&#8217;t matter,  Obama&#8217;s right now selling us out to the Chinese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
