<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New era for CSBJ</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csbj.com/2012/06/01/new-era-for-csbj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csbj.com/2012/06/01/new-era-for-csbj/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:10:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2012/06/01/new-era-for-csbj/comment-page-1/#comment-67578</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 23:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=54575#comment-67578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We will see how long till the slanted left writing appears. The journalism of the Indy is far from credible]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We will see how long till the slanted left writing appears. The journalism of the Indy is far from credible</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2012/06/01/new-era-for-csbj/comment-page-1/#comment-67577</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=54575#comment-67577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a little skeptical knowing who now has local ownership of the CSBJ. Keeping it fair and balanced was something I appreciated about the journal. I am not sure the INDY ownership is capable of of keeping what was already in my opinion a robust unbiased read. As far as Hazlehurst goes...better to keep him at the INDY. Way to opinionated for my taste anyway. 

Good luck INDY folks...you&#039;ll need it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a little skeptical knowing who now has local ownership of the CSBJ. Keeping it fair and balanced was something I appreciated about the journal. I am not sure the INDY ownership is capable of of keeping what was already in my opinion a robust unbiased read. As far as Hazlehurst goes&#8230;better to keep him at the INDY. Way to opinionated for my taste anyway. </p>
<p>Good luck INDY folks&#8230;you&#8217;ll need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: epitrone@sturmanindustries.com</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2012/06/01/new-era-for-csbj/comment-page-1/#comment-67574</link>
		<dc:creator>epitrone@sturmanindustries.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=54575#comment-67574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m simultaneously comforted that things won&#039;t change much and excited to see what additions will make the CSBJ even more indispensable than it already is.  Good luck, best wishes, break a leg, Mazel Tav, Buena Suerte . . .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m simultaneously comforted that things won&#8217;t change much and excited to see what additions will make the CSBJ even more indispensable than it already is.  Good luck, best wishes, break a leg, Mazel Tav, Buena Suerte . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
