<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EPA proposes stricter standards for soot pollution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csbj.com/2012/06/15/epa-proposes-stricter-standards-for-soot-pollution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csbj.com/2012/06/15/epa-proposes-stricter-standards-for-soot-pollution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 17:29:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladys</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2012/06/15/epa-proposes-stricter-standards-for-soot-pollution/comment-page-1/#comment-67683</link>
		<dc:creator>Gladys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=55328#comment-67683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right.  The MSM is so liberal.  The AP puts this paragraph full of negative spin against the President . . . 

&quot;The move, to be announced Friday, is likely to win support from environmental groups and public health advocates but exposes the president to potential criticism from congressional Republicans and industry officials that the rules are overly strict and could hurt economic growth and cause job losses in political swing states such as Ohio and Pennsylvania.&quot;

before this factual one (still rife with commentary)  . . . 

&quot;Perhaps wary of the rule’s political risk, the administration had sought to delay the new soot standards until after the November elections. But a federal judge ordered officials to act after 11 states filed a lawsuit seeking a decision this year by the Environmental Protection Agency.&quot;

AND, rather than write its own story and citing facts from various sources, the new &#039;liberal&#039; management at the CSBJ opted for this copy/paste method of journalism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right.  The MSM is so liberal.  The AP puts this paragraph full of negative spin against the President . . . </p>
<p>&#8220;The move, to be announced Friday, is likely to win support from environmental groups and public health advocates but exposes the president to potential criticism from congressional Republicans and industry officials that the rules are overly strict and could hurt economic growth and cause job losses in political swing states such as Ohio and Pennsylvania.&#8221;</p>
<p>before this factual one (still rife with commentary)  . . . </p>
<p>&#8220;Perhaps wary of the rule’s political risk, the administration had sought to delay the new soot standards until after the November elections. But a federal judge ordered officials to act after 11 states filed a lawsuit seeking a decision this year by the Environmental Protection Agency.&#8221;</p>
<p>AND, rather than write its own story and citing facts from various sources, the new &#8216;liberal&#8217; management at the CSBJ opted for this copy/paste method of journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
