<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bank battle: Bankers keep market share, each other in sights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csbj.com/2013/02/14/bank-battle-bankers-keep-market-share-each-other-in-sights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csbj.com/2013/02/14/bank-battle-bankers-keep-market-share-each-other-in-sights/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 17:48:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles L.</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2013/02/14/bank-battle-bankers-keep-market-share-each-other-in-sights/comment-page-1/#comment-78615</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 20:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=62661#comment-78615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard Money Commercial Loans
The Boyd Capital Group  makes loans on all commercial property types:

Apartments ♦ Office ♦ Industrial ♦ Mixed Use ♦ Retail Strip &amp; Shopping Centers  ♦ Hospitality ♦ Religious Institutions]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hard Money Commercial Loans<br />
The Boyd Capital Group  makes loans on all commercial property types:</p>
<p>Apartments ♦ Office ♦ Industrial ♦ Mixed Use ♦ Retail Strip &amp; Shopping Centers  ♦ Hospitality ♦ Religious Institutions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren Doucet</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2013/02/14/bank-battle-bankers-keep-market-share-each-other-in-sights/comment-page-1/#comment-78408</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren Doucet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 23:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=62661#comment-78408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, well, well; if one takes the time to fully discern the commentary herein, then much can be learned.

Good reporting CSBJ; that is one brutal article and many &quot;hidden&quot; comments.

Regardless, I could comment with 5 pages of brute force/etc explanations; but I will give just one example:

SEQUESTRATION:
    Originally a legal term referring generally to the act of valuable property being taken into custody by an agent of the court and locked away for safekeeping, usually to prevent the property from being disposed of or abused before a dispute over its ownership can be resolved. But the term has been adapted by Congress in more recent years to describe a new fiscal policy procedure originally provided for in the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Deficit Reduction Act of 1985 -- an effort to reform Congressional voting procedures so as to make the size of the Federal government&#039;s budget deficit a matter of conscious choice rather than simply the arithmetical outcome of a decentralized appropriations process in which no one ever looked at the cumulative results until it was too late to change them. 

Ouch! ....interesting times we live in.  HINT: Build from within businesses!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well, well; if one takes the time to fully discern the commentary herein, then much can be learned.</p>
<p>Good reporting CSBJ; that is one brutal article and many &#8220;hidden&#8221; comments.</p>
<p>Regardless, I could comment with 5 pages of brute force/etc explanations; but I will give just one example:</p>
<p>SEQUESTRATION:<br />
    Originally a legal term referring generally to the act of valuable property being taken into custody by an agent of the court and locked away for safekeeping, usually to prevent the property from being disposed of or abused before a dispute over its ownership can be resolved. But the term has been adapted by Congress in more recent years to describe a new fiscal policy procedure originally provided for in the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Deficit Reduction Act of 1985 &#8212; an effort to reform Congressional voting procedures so as to make the size of the Federal government&#8217;s budget deficit a matter of conscious choice rather than simply the arithmetical outcome of a decentralized appropriations process in which no one ever looked at the cumulative results until it was too late to change them. </p>
<p>Ouch! &#8230;.interesting times we live in.  HINT: Build from within businesses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
