<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Colorado Springs Business Journal &#187; medical malpractice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://csbj.com/tag/medical-malpractice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://csbj.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Malpractice litigation cutting in on physicians&#8217; authority</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2009/11/09/malpractice-litigation-cutting-in-on-physicians-authority/</link>
		<comments>http://csbj.com/2009/11/09/malpractice-litigation-cutting-in-on-physicians-authority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Staff Writer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=9543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medical malpractice litigation apparently has taken control away from the way doctors manage their practices.
An Atlanta-based Jackson health care survey showed that seventy-four percent of physicians believe they have less control over the way they practice medicine than they did five years ago.
Other factors affecting control included insurance and government interference.
Still, 85 percent said the threat [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://csbj.com/2009/11/09/malpractice-litigation-cutting-in-on-physicians-authority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Medical malpractice bill dies in the House</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2009/04/23/medical-malpractice-bill-dies-in-the-house/</link>
		<comments>http://csbj.com/2009/04/23/medical-malpractice-bill-dies-in-the-house/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 17:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gillentine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1344]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=3096</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill that would require insurance companies to get approval before raising premiums died on third and final reading in the state House of Representatives.
Supported by the Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, House Bill 1344 originally was written to raise non-economic caps for medical malpractice suits from $300,000 to $460,000. But the bill didn&#8217;t have enough [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://csbj.com/2009/04/23/medical-malpractice-bill-dies-in-the-house/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malpractice bill now targets insurance regulation</title>
		<link>http://csbj.com/2009/04/21/malpractice-bill-now-targets-insurance-regulation/</link>
		<comments>http://csbj.com/2009/04/21/malpractice-bill-now-targets-insurance-regulation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Amy Gillentine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Daily News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COPIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CTLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HB 1344]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical malpractice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://csbj.com/?p=3032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bill that would increase damage awards in malpractice lawsuits has changed &#8211; dramatically.
As first introduced, House Bill 1344 raised non-economic damages cap on malpractice suits from $300,000 to $460,000. But, bill sponsors scrapped the cap-increase portion of the bill after failing to find enough support for it.
As it&#8217;s worded now, the bill would require insurance companies [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://csbj.com/2009/04/21/malpractice-bill-now-targets-insurance-regulation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

